Judge Declares Another Mistrial in Harvey Weinstein New York Rape Case
The decision follows three days of jury deliberations that ended in a deadlock, marking the third time a New York jury has weighed these allegations.
Primary source: BBC World News. Full source links, newsroom standards, and correction details are below.
Fast summary
Start here
- Judge Curtis Farber declared a mistrial after the jury confirmed they were hopelessly deadlocked on the rape charges.
- A juror reported that nine members voted to acquit Weinstein while three voted to convict.
- Manhattan prosecutors are currently determining whether to attempt a third retrial for the 74-year-old former film mogul.
What happened
Judge Curtis Farber ended the trial on Friday after a Manhattan jury signaled it could not reach a unanimous verdict. The month-long trial focused on allegations that Harvey Weinstein raped aspiring actress Jessica Mann in a hotel room more than a decade ago. Despite being ordered to continue deliberations earlier in the day, the jury informed the court they were unable to reach a consensus, leading the judge to conclude that further deliberation would be futile.
What's new in this update
Post-trial disclosures revealed a significant split in the jury room, with a majority of nine jurors favoring acquittal versus three who wanted to convict. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg released a statement expressing disappointment in the mistrial but noted that his office is now consulting with Ms. Mann to decide the next steps, including the possibility of another trial.
Key details
Weinstein, who appeared in court in a wheelchair, showed no facial expression as the mistrial was declared. His legal team argued that public prejudice against their client had made a fair trial difficult, suggesting that for some, a 'not guilty' verdict has become socially impossible. The prosecution defended its approach, asserting that they will continue to pursue crimes of sexual violence in a survivor-centered manner regardless of the defendant's profile.
Background and context
This case has faced a complex legal path since Weinstein's original 2020 conviction was overturned in 2024. An appeals court previously found that the original trial was unfair because it included testimony from women whose allegations were not part of the formal charges. A subsequent retrial last year also resulted in a deadlocked jury on the rape count, leading to this most recent third attempt at a verdict.
What to watch next
The Manhattan District Attorney's Office must now weigh the resources and potential for a different outcome before deciding to try the case for a fourth time. Weinstein remains incarcerated as he faces separate sentencing in a California sexual assault case and awaits the resolution of his pending legal matters in New York.
Why this matters
This outcome underscores the legal difficulties of retrying high-profile sexual assault cases and leaves the resolution of years of legal proceedings in Manhattan uncertain.
Reader context
This story belongs to Northstar Herald's Human Rights coverage, with related entities including Harvey Weinstein, New York Judiciary, Sexual Assault Trial, Jessica Mann. The report is based on BBC World News source material.
Related coverage
Why it matters
This outcome underscores the legal difficulties of retrying high-profile sexual assault cases and leaves the resolution of years of legal proceedings in Manhattan uncertain.
Read next
Follow this story through the topic hub, more world coverage, and the latest updates.
Weekly briefing
Get the week's key developments in one concise email.
Get a fast catch-up on the biggest stories, the context behind them, and the links worth your time.
Cadence
Weekly, for a quick catch-up
Coverage
AI, business, world, security, sports
Format
Clear takeaways and useful context
Request the briefing
Leave your email to open a prepared request and get on the list for the weekly briefing.
Author
The world desk follows geopolitics, humanitarian crises, diplomacy, and major international developments with an emphasis on fast updates and public-interest context.
Sources and methodology