Knicks Complete Record-Breaking Comeback to Move One Win Away From
New York overcame a 29-point deficit at Madison Square Garden to beat the San Antonio Spurs 107-106 in Game 4 of the NBA Finals.
World correspondent
Reports on international affairs, diplomacy, and humanitarian developments with an emphasis on official statements, multilateral institutions, and regional context.
Editorial responsibility: Lead reviewer for geopolitics, international institutions, and crisis coverage
Primary source: BBC World News. Full source links and update notes are below.
Fast summary
Start here
- The New York Knicks recorded the largest comeback in NBA Finals history on Wednesday night, overcoming a 29-point deficit.
- Player OG Anunoby scored the winning basket with 1.2 seconds remaining on the clock to secure the 107-106 victory.
- The win gives the Knicks a 3-1 series lead, putting them one win away from their first championship since 1973.

What happened
The New York Knicks made a historic 29-point comeback against the San Antonio Spurs in the NBA Finals, winning 107-106 in Game 4 and moving one victory away from their first championship since 1973. The result stands as the largest comeback in NBA Finals history, turning what looked like a disastrous home loss into one of the most memorable nights the franchise has seen in decades.
For the Knicks, the comeback was not only dramatic. It was potentially transformational. A team that once looked close to letting the series slip now holds a 3-1 lead and has a direct path to ending one of the longest title droughts in New York sports.
What's new in this update
The defining new development is that the game entered the history books immediately. Comebacks happen in the NBA every season, but a 29-point comeback in the Finals changes the emotional and psychological balance of a championship series. The Knicks did not merely survive. They produced a result that can alter belief on both sides of the matchup.
That matters because the Spurs were not just beaten on the scoreboard. They were beaten after appearing fully in control. In playoff basketball, collapses of that size can linger into the next game because they force teams to revisit not only tactics, but poise, trust, and late-game composure.
Key details
The game ended with OG Anunoby scoring the winning basket with 1.2 seconds left, completing the final swing in a comeback that had already electrified Madison Square Garden. New York's surge ignited the arena and spilled into the city, where celebrations quickly spread after the final whistle.
Several elements make the comeback especially significant:
- It is the largest comeback in NBA Finals history
- It gives the Knicks a 3-1 series lead over San Antonio
- It places New York one win from its first title in more than 50 years
- It elevates Anunoby's winning play into franchise-lore territory
The celebrity presence and massive reaction around the Garden also reinforced the scale of the moment. But the larger point is competitive: the Knicks now have both the series advantage and the emotional momentum.
Background and context
The Knicks vs. Spurs NBA Finals matchup already carried historical resonance because of the franchises' past and because New York had not reached this stage in a generation. That context makes the comeback even more meaningful. The Knicks have spent decades searching for a modern team capable of delivering a signature championship moment. Game 4 may now be remembered as exactly that.
The timing also matters. New York had been trying to convert Finals participation into true championship control. Falling behind by 29 points at home would normally signal vulnerability. Instead, the comeback suggests a roster with resilience, emotional discipline, and enough shot-making to survive even when the game script turns hostile.
For San Antonio, the loss raises immediate questions. Teams can recover from ordinary defeats. Recovering from a record-setting collapse in the Finals is harder because every decision, substitution, and possession gets reexamined under the pressure of missed opportunity.
What to watch next
The Knicks now head into the next game with the chance to clinch the championship, and the central question is whether they can convert this emotional peak into a finishing performance. Momentum is real, but so is the challenge of closing out a wounded opponent on the road.
Three follow-up issues matter most:
- Whether the Spurs can recover mentally from the collapse
- Whether the Knicks can replicate their second-half urgency from the start
- How much Game 4 reshapes confidence in the series' final stretch
If New York closes it out quickly, the comeback will become the defining turning point of the Finals. If San Antonio answers immediately, the historic rally may still matter, but more as a single legendary game than as the moment the title was decided.
Why this matters
The Knicks make historic 29-point comeback against Spurs in NBA Finals story matters because it combines history, pressure, and championship stakes in one game. This was not just a thrilling comeback. It may prove to be the play-by-play turning point that finally carries the Knicks out of a half-century title drought.
For the franchise, for Madison Square Garden, and for New York basketball, that makes the win larger than one night. It makes it part of legacy.
Why it matters
This historic victory positions the Knicks to end a 51-year championship drought and marks a significant turnaround for a franchise that last reached the finals in 1999.
Read next
Follow this story through the topic hub, more world coverage, and the latest updates.
Weekly briefing
Get the week's key developments in one concise email.
Get a fast catch-up on the biggest stories, the context behind them, and the links worth your time.
Cadence
Weekly, for a quick catch-up
Coverage
AI, business, world, security, sports
Format
Clear takeaways and useful context
Request the briefing
Leave your email to open a prepared request and get on the list for the weekly briefing.
About the byline
World correspondent
Leila Haddad covers world affairs, diplomacy, and humanitarian crises, with a focus on how fast-moving international developments affect public policy, conflict response, and cross-border institutions.
Sources and methodology